Hawcx vs Silverfort for AI agent authentication

Both link AI agents to the people behind them and check each tool call before it runs. Hawcx also starts each agent at a person’s phishing-resistant sign-in, carries proof of who delegated every action, and gives every tool call a grant that works once.

Hawcx vs Silverfort, side by side

Nine capabilities: the six most vendors now cover, and the three that carry a person’s authority to each action.

Hawcx vs Silverfort, capability by capability
CapabilityHawcxSilverfort
The basics
DiscoveryFinds the agents already running across your tools.PartialFull
Zero standing credentialsAgents hold no long-lived secrets; access is issued when it’s needed.FullNot covered
Agent authenticationEach agent proves its own identity.FullFull
Authorization policyRules decide what each agent may do.FullFull
Runtime enforcementEvery call is checked before it runs.FullFull
Governance and auditA record of every agent, its owner and its actions.FullPartial
From the person to the action
Phishing-resistant human root of trustThe agent’s authority starts with a person’s phishing-resistant sign-in.FullPartial
Proof of delegation on every actionEach action carries proof that a specific person delegated it.FullNot covered
A single-use grant for every tool callA captured call can’t run twice.FullNot covered

FullPartialNot coveredBased on public materials, September 2026.

Which one fits?

Hawcx

Choose Hawcx when

Agents must hold no standing credentials, each tool call has to carry cryptographic proof of the person who delegated it, and a captured call should never run twice.

Silverfort

Choose Silverfort when

Your priority is finding every AI agent across clouds, identity providers and SaaS, mapping each to an owner, and enforcing runtime policy on the same platform that protects your human and service accounts.

All comparisons

Bring a tool call. We’ll replay it.